Declaration of Independence

July 4, 2007 at 11:27 pm | In history | Leave a Comment

The National Archives has a nice, very in-depth, analysis of The Declaration of Independence:

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration_style.html

[link from BoingBoing]

You can see the Declaration itself, too:

http://www.archives.gov/national-archives-experience/charters/declaration.html

Happy Independence Day!

On scholarly communication among historians

July 3, 2007 at 5:30 pm | In history, libraries, scholarly communication | 5 Comments

[This will be a series of very loosely connected ideas because I don't have time to "work them up" right now, but I don't want to forget too many of my thoughts (I've already misplaced a few ideas about this from last night)]

Sometimes, librarians wonder how academics convey information to each other and often do things like study the citation patterns in journal articles to get a glimpse into an exotic world (librarians do “ethnographic” studies as well – though while librarians often put students into the “savage slot,” I’m not sure that academics are seen as savages in the same way. I think it’s more that librarians see academics as The Mysterious Other.). Luckily for librarians, there is now this thing called the Internet where academics leave traces of their scholarly communication, thus allowing librarians to observe academics “in the field,” as it were.

Here’s Mark Grimsley (the author behind the most excellent Blog Them Out of the Stone Age) describing how he conceptualizes a new “information need” (to use the librarian lingo):

When I think about how to go about it, my first instinct is to turn the issue around: What approach would best assist me if I were trying to learn a subject area in which I had no graduate training? This has actually happened more than once, and it’s invariably been a source of some anxiety. What is the cognitive landscape? Do I understand the main conceptual frameworks that define the area? Am I finding the best books and articles on the subject? Are there opportunities and/or mine fields of which I’m unaware? All these questions occur to me well before the crucial one: just how exactly will a knowledge of field X assist me in my own professional work?

These questions help provide a framework for understanding the information needs of graduate students as well, and I think are interesting because they can be a way of conceptualizing how librarians fit into the research cycle of historians. I don’t think many historians would find Grimsley’s questions foreign; this sounds a bit like how anyone trying to learn the field would go about it.

But then how does an historian go about answering these questions? Let’s take a look at the context for Grimsley’s questions above: he’s responding to another historian (Rebecca Goetz) who wants to know how better to integrate military history into her teaching (“Military History 101“). Grimsley doesn’t respond with “Look it up!” Instead he offers suggestions and more generally shares his expertise. While I don’t want to make this exchange into a model of “how historians do things,” it is productive to note the following:

**The learning process has a social element: Goetz remarks that she’d rather learn in a seminar setting; this whole exchange started because Goetz asked a recognized expert in the field how she might learn more about military history.
**While this exchange was facilitated by a blog, I don’t think one can assume that social software is what makes this kind of exchange possible; my guess is that, generally, the difference that social software makes is in making this kind of exchange more explicit (visible) and easier/faster (it facilitates); my own experience tells me that this sort of conversation happens all of the time. I recognize that I may be underselling the role of technology in this, but back in the day when things were sent in the mail and I was still using a typewriter, there were exchanges like this in classrooms, over the phone, via post, and at conferences.
**How useful, given this exchange and Grimsley’s enumeration of his own learning process, are library catalogs or library databases as they exist right now? That is, if we have a hypothetical researcher who wants to integrate military history into his or her “knowledge base” (to use the information literacy term), are the resources we offer the best way to resolve this kind of information need?
**Would librarians be more useful if we had expertise in subject areas beyond “search and discovery”?

Digital Collection of WWII Government Publications

May 4, 2007 at 9:31 pm | In history, libraries | 1 Comment

The GPO and SMU have just announced a new digital collection of World War Two government publications. Historic Government Publications from World War II: A Digital Library makes available a vast body of government information covering both the military and the homefront. All of the documents are available as PDFs and the whole collection can be browsed or searched. There are two collections separated out for easier access: Pocket Guides prepared for U.S. soldiers and The Melvin C. Shaffer Collection of photographs depicting North Africa and parts of Europe during the war.

[link from beSpacific, where you can also get the link to the PDF of the press release, should you want to read it]

University of Georgia Press “White Sale”

April 10, 2007 at 8:00 pm | In history, libraries, literature | Leave a Comment

The University of Georgia Press is having its White Sale 2007: hundreds of titles (in history, anthropology & folklore, literature, and environmental studies) at 75% off. Go forth and multiply your book collections!

Shakespeare and Politics

March 29, 2007 at 8:57 pm | In history, literature | Leave a Comment

The next installment of Open Source will feature Stephen Greenblatt discussing Shakespeare and Power. There are a lot of “extra credit” readings listed, so get busy!

For those of you who aren’t already aware, the last Open Source show (The First Neo-Cons and “The Last Mughal”) featured William Dalrymple discussing his book The Last Mughal (which has gotten at least one good review) with Ram Manikkalingam and Manan Ahmed.

200th Anniversary of Slave Trade Abolition Bill in Britain

February 23, 2007 at 7:58 pm | In history | Leave a Comment

Tom Stave, our Documents Librarian, came by this morning to hand me a photocopy of columns 993-994 from Vol. VIII. (1807) of Cobbett’s Parliamentary Debates. On February 23, 1807, the British Parliament passed the Slave Trade Abolition Bill; here are William Wilberforce’s final arguments as published in the Parliamentary Debates:

Mr. Wilberforce replied to the principal arguments which had been urged against the bill. He observed, that ever since he had engaged in this discussion, he had always endeavoured to avoid any expression which might be considered unjustly injurious towards those who opposed him. But it was not to be expected that the friends of the abolition were to overlook the general effect of human passions. Despotic power could not be possessed without much abuse in the exercise of it. All that he imputed to the West-India planters was, that they had yielded to the circumstances under which they existed. The children in the islands were accustomed to see an order of beings around them which they were taught to consider as inferior. Thus their prejudices were formed. It was not them, therefore, that he blamed; but those who, though not placed in a situation to be misled on the subject of this traffic, and who had the opportunity of seeing its horrors in their true colors, who possessed the power of putting an end to the evil, and yet had suffered it to exist. He referred to Mr. Parke’s book, to shew the evils which the slave trade created in Africa. It had been contended that Mr. Malthus, in his Essay on Population, had favoured the slave trade; the fact, however, was not so. Indeed, Mr. Malthus had called upon him that day, and expressed his surprise to have learned, that in some publications of the day he was regarded as a favourer of the slave trade; and stated that he had written an appendix to his work, to remove that impression. It was said, why not put an end to the lottery, and other evils in this country? He acknowledged that he considered the lottery a very bad mode of raising money, and would concur in any measure for putting an end to it, if there were any prospect of success in the attempt; but he was sorry to see gentlemen reduced to arguments of this sort. They searched out every recess of misery and vice in their own country, they looked around them every where for evils, and hugged them all to their bosoms. With regard to the complaints that had been made of his conduct towards the West-India planters, he had always been as just towards those gentlemen as he could. He had never behaved to them with any harshness, but he could never carry complaisance so far towards them, or any set of men alive, as to compliment away the rights and happiness of millions of human beings. The hon. gent. pronounced an eulogium upon the display of character and talent which the house had that night witnessed on the side of humanity and justice, particularly on the part of the younger members; whose lofty and liberal sentiments recommended and enforced by the elevation of their rank, and the purity of their form, must tend to produce the happiest effects upon all classes of the community. Such an indication of mind and feeling must afford gratification to any reflecting man, and diffuse the most salutary lessons throughout the country; must shew to the people, that their legislators, and especially the higher order of their youth, were forward to assert the rights of the weak against the strong; to vindicate the cause of the oppressed; and that where a practice was found to prevail, inconsistent with humanity and justice, no consideration of profit could reconcile them to its continuance. The generous and humane principles which had been that day unfolded, were worthy of a British parliament to teach, and of a British people to learn.

A brief list of books and websites for those with an interest in learning more:

Book Reviews from Business History Review

January 18, 2007 at 12:01 am | In history, reviews | 1 Comment

I just discovered that Business History Review posts many of its book reviews online.  The archives page provides access to reviews going back to 2002; there are also article abstracts available going back to 1954 and indexes for volume 53 (1979) up to the present.  Very useful!

Death of Jean-Pierre Vernant

January 12, 2007 at 2:43 am | In history | Leave a Comment

The classical scholar Jean-Pierre Vernant died on January 9.  There is an obit in Le Monde with links to other pieces and an English-language obituary in The Independent Online.

Yale University Press Book Sale

November 28, 2006 at 6:26 pm | In history | Leave a Comment

Yale Univ. Press is having a holiday sale and there are a number of good titles available (for example, books in the Yale Intellectual History of the West series, one of my faves). The discounts are significant, so check it out!

Google Custom Search Engine for History

October 26, 2006 at 9:23 pm | In history, open access | 1 Comment

After reading a few posts on Open Access News (here’s one post about OpenDOAR’s custom search engine), I decided to try Google’s custom search engine. I created a history search engine that searched open access journals, important collections of primary sources (American Memory, History Matters, etc.), and Sharon’s Early Modern Web pages. I can add additional sites as I go along, but in general it seems like an interesting way to have students search a more limited universe of material. Anyway, I put the search box on my history subject guide page at work.  Let me know what you think (or make other suggestions for web resources to search). I can invite others to collaborate on the search engine, so if you’d like to help expand the resources that it searches (or refine them), also let me know via the comments.

« Previous PageNext Page »

Blog at WordPress.com. | Theme: Pool by Borja Fernandez.
Entries and comments feeds.